Friday, March 30, 2012
Replication Error using Ras Connection win2003srv
If I disable my LAN syncronize success
but if I enable My LAN syncronize Fail (cannot connecting to subscriber)
It sounds like you lan connection can't resolve the host name of your subscriber, but it can for the ras dial up.
Can you try to check your hosts file entry for this subscriber? It will be in c:\%windir%\system32\drivers\etc and is called hosts. open it up in a text editor.
if it is not there check the client network setting for this server and verify that the ip address is valid.
Is the subscriber parked in the DMZ by chance? If so it may have a different address.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
"Nur Firmanullah" wrote:
> I use Dial up (RAS) Connection for syncronize
> If I disable my LAN syncronize success
> but if I enable My LAN syncronize Fail (cannot connecting to subscriber)
>
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Replication and use of Remote Server
be configured to use Linked Server instead? Linked server seems to have all
the same capability as Remote Server (and more).
LMK
In SQL 2005 they are all linked servers. IIRC it can, you have to give it
the name of distr_admin. Drill down in remote servers to determine what the
name should be.
Why do you want to do this?
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"LMK" <LMK@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6DD94C8B-7AB8-463D-A4DB-CA42A3C5E7B1@.microsoft.com...
> When Replication is configured it creates a remote server connection. Can
> it
> be configured to use Linked Server instead? Linked server seems to have
> all
> the same capability as Remote Server (and more).
> --
> LMK
|||In this same server, we have a separate true need for a linked server
pointing back to the same master server. I cannot create a linked server with
the same name as a remote server. Therefore if I can change the remote server
for rep to a linked server instead, I have solved both problems. I am on
Win2000. So are you saying that I cannot make this change to Linked Server in
Win2000?
LMK
"Hilary Cotter" wrote:
> In SQL 2005 they are all linked servers. IIRC it can, you have to give it
> the name of distr_admin. Drill down in remote servers to determine what the
> name should be.
> Why do you want to do this?
> --
> Hilary Cotter
> Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
> RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
> This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
> positions, strategies or opinions.
> Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
> http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
> Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
> http://www.indexserverfaq.com
>
> "LMK" <LMK@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6DD94C8B-7AB8-463D-A4DB-CA42A3C5E7B1@.microsoft.com...
>
>
Monday, March 12, 2012
Replication Active Connection
to populate our reporting server. We have a thrid party software which we
need to use a interface to take a cvs file and import it into their database.
The interface requires that it has exclusive access to the database. Since we
are running replication there is always a constant connection to the
published database. Is there away to stop that connection. I have tried
stopping the synchronization but it seems to me the only way to remove that
connection is to delete the publiction. Is there an easier way.
Message posted via droptable.com
http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200610/1
If the third party software needs access to the subscriber database you
could stop the distribution agent, or have the third party application put
the database in read only or single user mode before it starts to do its
work.
Hilary Cotter
Director of Text Mining and Database Strategy
RelevantNOISE.Com - Dedicated to mining blogs for business intelligence.
This posting is my own and doesn't necessarily represent RelevantNoise's
positions, strategies or opinions.
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"masmith via droptable.com" <u27472@.uwe> wrote in message
news:680d19bf42976@.uwe...
> Using SQL Server 2000 transactional replication which is running
> continously
> to populate our reporting server. We have a thrid party software which we
> need to use a interface to take a cvs file and import it into their
> database.
> The interface requires that it has exclusive access to the database. Since
> we
> are running replication there is always a constant connection to the
> published database. Is there away to stop that connection. I have tried
> stopping the synchronization but it seems to me the only way to remove
> that
> connection is to delete the publiction. Is there an easier way.
> --
> Message posted via droptable.com
> http://www.droptable.com/Uwe/Forums...ation/200610/1
>
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Replication
We have two systems one that has a domain setup and the other is a workgroup. We have them connected over a non-trusted internet connection. We are using SQL Server 2005 Enterprise version, for Peer-to-Peer transactional replication, the server that hasa domain, is called EXT-FRMAC1 and the other one is FRMAC_DC. FRMAC_DC can subscribe to EXT-FRMAC1's publication, but EXT-FRMAC1 can't subscribe to FRMAC_DC, and the error that we get on FRMAC_DC, is that FRMAC_DC\admin - username or password does not exist. admin exists on FRMAC_DC, I am not sure if we should try and put it on a domain or not.
Thanks.
Have you tried to setup with a SQL server account instead of Windows account?
Gary
Replication
replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection. I have very
limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this reliably.
Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied then
imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa be a
better way.
I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but really
can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at this
point.
Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
Thanks in advance.
- Ben"Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants the
data
> replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated to a
centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL, etc.).
> I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
reliably.
> Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
> emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied then
> imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa be
a
> better way.
> I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but really
> can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
this
> point.
> Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> Thanks in advance.
> - Ben|||"Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
news:1Geic.14066$d7.8263@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants the
> data
> > replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
> Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated to
a
> centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL, etc.).
> > I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
> reliably.
> > Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
> > emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied
then
> > imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa
be
> a
> > better way.
> > I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but
really
> > can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
> this
> > point.
> > Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> > Thanks in advance.
> > - Ben
You might want to post in microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication for more
information, but I believe that Access is only supported as a subscriber
(receives data) not a publisher (sends data).
Alternatives would include setting up linked servers to the Access
databases, and pulling in the data with direct SELECT queries. Or use DTS to
create a generic data transfer package, which is parameterized based on the
Access DB location.
See "sp_addlinkedserver" and "Heterogeneous Subscribers" in Books Online for
more information.
Simon|||"Simon Hayes" <sql@.hayes.ch> wrote in message
news:4089b32d_2@.news.bluewin.ch...
> "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> news:1Geic.14066$d7.8263@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> > news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > > I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants
the
> > data
> > > replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
> > Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated
to
> a
> > centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL,
etc.).
> > > I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
> > reliably.
> > > > Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data
then
> > > emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied
> then
> > > imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa
> be
> > a
> > > better way.
> > > > I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but
> really
> > > can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
> > this
> > > point.
> > > > Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > - Ben
> > > You might want to post in microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication for more
> information, but I believe that Access is only supported as a subscriber
> (receives data) not a publisher (sends data).
> Alternatives would include setting up linked servers to the Access
> databases, and pulling in the data with direct SELECT queries. Or use DTS
to
> create a generic data transfer package, which is parameterized based on
the
> Access DB location.
> See "sp_addlinkedserver" and "Heterogeneous Subscribers" in Books Online
for
> more information.
> Simon
Thanks for the leads.
Replication
replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection. I have very
limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this reliably.
Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied then
imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa be a
better way.
I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but really
can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at this
point.
Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
Thanks in advance.
- Ben"Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants the
data
> replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated to a
centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL, etc.).
> I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
reliably.
> Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
> emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied then
> imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa be
a
> better way.
> I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but really
> can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
this
> point.
> Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> Thanks in advance.
> - Ben|||"Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
news:1Geic.14066$d7.8263@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants the
> data
> > replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
> Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated to
a
> centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL, etc.).
> > I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
> reliably.
> > Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data then
> > emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied
then
> > imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa
be
> a
> > better way.
> > I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but
really
> > can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
> this
> > point.
> > Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> > Thanks in advance.
> > - Ben
You might want to post in microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication for more
information, but I believe that Access is only supported as a subscriber
(receives data) not a publisher (sends data).
Alternatives would include setting up linked servers to the Access
databases, and pulling in the data with direct SELECT queries. Or use DTS to
create a generic data transfer package, which is parameterized based on the
Access DB location.
See "sp_addlinkedserver" and "Heterogeneous Subscribers" in Books Online for
more information.
Simon|||"Simon Hayes" <sql@.hayes.ch> wrote in message
news:4089b32d_2@.news.bluewin.ch...
> "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> news:1Geic.14066$d7.8263@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > "Ben" <Sorry@.TooManyViruses.com> wrote in message
> > news:6Eeic.14065$d7.7176@.twister.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> > > I have a customer who has Access databases at local sites who wants
the
> > data
> > > replicated nightly to MS-SQL Server using broadband connection.
> > Clarification: They want data stored in Access at many sites replicated
to
> a
> > centralized MS-SQL Database via broadband connections (Cable, DSL,
etc.).
> > > I have very limited knowledge of best practices to accomplish this
> > reliably.
> > > > Right now they are using some Java app that exports the Access data
then
> > > emails the files as CSV. The emails are then manually taken, copied
> then
> > > imported. Very cumbersome process and VERY unreliable. There's gotaa
> be
> > a
> > > better way.
> > > > I want to recomend that they contract an expert to set this up but
> really
> > > can't even say for certian what type of person they should look for at
> > this
> > > point.
> > > > Any ideas from a 40,000 foot perspective?
> > > > Thanks in advance.
> > > > - Ben
> > > You might want to post in microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication for more
> information, but I believe that Access is only supported as a subscriber
> (receives data) not a publisher (sends data).
> Alternatives would include setting up linked servers to the Access
> databases, and pulling in the data with direct SELECT queries. Or use DTS
to
> create a generic data transfer package, which is parameterized based on
the
> Access DB location.
> See "sp_addlinkedserver" and "Heterogeneous Subscribers" in Books Online
for
> more information.
> Simon
Thanks for the leads.|||I have more than 7 years of Experience with Replication if you want I can
Help u out in this. Please email me nehapatel75@.yahoo.com